News anchor sues Facebook, Reddit after creepy photo appears in ads

Hepp mentioned she did not know that her photo had been taken, and did not keep in mind the identify or location of the shop. She additionally wasn’t conscious of how the photo might need made its method on-line.

The calls on the websites to each take down the images and pay damages as compensation.

The possibilities of success aren’t excessive. The ’s contentious Section 230 protects websites in opposition to legal responsibility for user-uploaded content material, together with advertisers. Hepp must both present that the websites knowingly hosted the photo or goal the people who uploaded the image. Most if not the entire websites could be absolved of duty. This does illustrate the authorized complications related to combating non-consensual images, although. It’s straightforward for photographs to unfold on-line, however troublesome to carry the perpetrators (or anybody else) to account.

To Top
%d bloggers like this: