Uber reportedly tells its staff not to disclose potential crimes


According to The Washington Post, numerous ’s Special Investigations staff have come ahead to reveal that they’re forbidden from contacting the police or advising victims to pursue authorized recommendation following an occasion of assault. Meanwhile, the corporate has a beneficiant three-strikes system which retains drivers on the street lengthy after they have been accused of a critical offence. One New York allegedly made three separate sexual advances on riders however was allowed to proceed working till a fourth incident, when a rider claimed she was raped, the investigators say.

Further, within the occasion {that a} driver is blocked from the platform, Uber does not share its data with police, background verify corporations or different corporations, leaving the motive force open to employment with different corporations the place passengers could also be in danger. According to Tracey Breeden, Uber’s international heal of girls’s , this specific coverage is designed to be “survivor-centric,” permitting the complainant to “own their story” and make their very own determination about contacting the police.

“At the end of the day, we’re not the judge and jury to determine whether a has occurred,” she continued. “We’re here to gather information, make a decision. We’re not law enforcement.”

Uber has repeatedly tried to distance itself from the authorized considerations of each its drivers and riders, asserting that as a know-how platform — a intermediary — it will probably’t be held accountable for what occurs throughout a trip, and that as drivers are unbiased contractors and not staff it is not chargeable for their actions. These questionable insurance policies are not unique to Uber, nonetheless. Lyft has additionally confronted a number of lawsuits over conduct throughout rides, and as The Washington Post experiences, interviews with Lyft staff additionally point out that the corporate needs to restrict its legal responsibility for rider and driver interactions.

Uber has carried out numerous security measures in latest occasions, but when these contemporary experiences are true, it seems the corporate’s controversial strategy to security may be very a lot ingrained in its ethos, and its security options solely pay lip service to involved clients and stakeholders. Indeed, cities world wide are revisiting their attitudes to the corporate in mild of the various it faces. In , for instance, the agency has been granted a two-month extension on its proper to function whereas Transport for finally decides whether or not to grant them one other five-year license, or ban them from their most vital European market altogether.