Today we’re going to evaluation the sub-$200 graphics card market and see the way it compares to what we had been supplied only a few years in the past. We lately did this for the $400 value vary and it was tremendous fascinating, pitting the GTX 1070 of yesteryear towards immediately’s RTX 2060 Super and the Radeon 5700 XT. We discovered that AMD provides a stable improve over previous $400 merchandise with the 5700 XT, which beat the GTX 1070 by ~50% on common. Meanwhile, the RTX 2060 Super was much less spectacular, providing a 35% efficiency bump.
We’re positively hoping to see some worth added on the sub-$200 stage. The most up-to-date addition to this section is the AMD Radeon 5500 XT. We reviewed it a few month in the past, and regardless of providing stable efficiency relative to Nvidia’s GTX 1650 Super, the 5500 XT pricing is an enormous let down.
AMD is trying to cost a small premium for this GPU that does nothing to enhance the section, that means the 5500 XT isn’t price shopping for on the $170-200 MSRP. Worse nonetheless, the 5500 XT is restricted to PCIe x8 operation which suggests you solely get PCIe 3.zero x16 bandwidth when utilizing a PCIe 4.zero enabled system and for that you just want a high-end X570 motherboard.
After the disappointing 5500 XT launch, we thought we may take a look at how the sub $200 market has progressed over the previous Four years or so. Our comparability consists of the likes of the Radeon R9 370X and GeForce GTX 950, together with the Radeon RX 470 and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.
Sub-$200 AMD Radeon GPUs
The Radeon R9 370X was launched in mid-2015 for $180 as a third era refresh. Previously generally known as the R9 270 and 270X in late 2013, and offered for $180 and $200, respectively. These first-gen GCN components all originated from the Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition, launched manner again in 2012 for $350.
The Radeon RX 470 was launched in mid-2016 for $180 and was later refreshed, generally known as the RX 570 in mid-2017 for $170.
Sub-$200 Nvidia GeForce GPUs
As for the inexperienced workforce, the GeForce GTX 950 was launched in late 2015 for $160. This GPU wasn’t a refresh and it didn’t get refreshed both. Following on in late 2016 was the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti for $140. Three years would go earlier than a substitute was issued for this card. The GTX 1650 noticed the sunshine in 2019 for $150, and was successfully changed by the 1650 Super at $160 late final yr.
That’s the historical past, now let’s get into the testing.
All graphics playing cards had been benchmarked in our Core i9-9900Okay check system utilizing the most recent drivers and sport variations accessible on the time of testing. Out of curiosity we’ve additionally included the 2013 Tomb Raider reboot in immediately’s benchmark suite to see how the GPUs examine in an older title.
The first sport in our lineup is Battlefield V and right here the Radeon R9 370X and GTX 950 are our baseline, each averaging 35fps. The 1050 Ti which wasn’t probably the most thrilling product supplied a 37% efficiency enhance, which is way more than the 22% enhance the 1650 provides over the 1050 Ti. You can see why we had been so down on the unique GTX 1650. Within the identical yr the 1650 Super was launched and it is 67% quicker than the GTX 1050 Ti. This is clearly what the 1650 ought to have been.
As for AMD, we see that they managed an enormous 103% efficiency enhance from the 370X to the RX 470 and the 470’s MSRP was lowered by $10. The 570 refresh although was so much much less thrilling, right here we’re taking a look at a mere 6% efficiency enhance. Then from the 570 to the 5500 XT an extra 11%, not precisely inspiring stuff from the crimson workforce. Basically they overachieved with the 470 and it’s come again to chunk them.
This time when testing with Call of Duty Modern Warfare we see a stable 36% enhance for the 1050 Ti over the 950 after which a slightly large 43% bounce as much as the GTX 1650. That mentioned, the GTX 1650 Super was nonetheless nearly 50% quicker than the vanilla 1650 and that meant it was a whopping 113% quicker than the GTX 1050 Ti.
Comparing the 1650 Super to the GTX 1050 Ti generally is a bit deceptive although, because the Pascal GPU was all the time horrible worth. Realistically we’re taking a look at a RX 470 for 2016 efficiency and doing so meant the GTX 1650 Super is simply 36% quicker, so not as nice.
Worse nonetheless, on this title the 5500 XT was a mere 16% quicker than the RX 470.
The GTX 950 is one of the best of the 2015 GPUs in F1 2019, besides the RX 470 was a whopping 106% quicker.
But from the RX 470 we’re taking a look at simply 16% enhance with the 5500 XT, a reasonably depressing bump in spite of everything these years. Remember the RX 470 was launched at simply $180, the 4GB 5500 XT prices $170.
The Far Cry New Dawn outcomes are fascinating, right here the GTX 1050 Ti was 14% quicker than the GTX 950 whereas the GTX 1650 was 23% quicker than the 1050 Ti. The ~70% bounce from the GTX 1050 Ti to the 1650 Super could be very spectacular, however once more it’s actually the RX 470 that we needs to be utilizing for comparability right here and the 1650 Super is about 21% quicker and the 5500 XT isn’t a lot better.
Testing with Gears 5 reveals a 76% efficiency enhance from the GTX 950 to the RX 470. That’s clearly a big efficiency uplift. But from the 470 to the 5500 XT we’re taking a look at lower than 30% enhance.
We see a 76% enhance going from the GTX 950 to the RX 470, this time when testing with Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order. A milder 28% enhance from the 470 to the 1650 Super is seen. These outcomes additionally show how horrible the GTX 1650 is, placing numbers simply 15% quicker than the GTX 1050 Ti.
Unlike the opposite titles examined, Metro Exodus was benchmarked utilizing the extremely high quality settings and this appears to cripple the newer GeForce GPUs within the GTX 1050 Ti, 1650 and 1650 Super. The 1650 Super is barely capable of match the RX 470, besides the 5500 XT was simply 17% quicker than the RX 470.
The Rainbow Six Siege outcomes look very similar to lots of the different titles already examined. Here the GTX 1650 does nicely due to the enhancements made by the Turing structure, nevertheless it’s nonetheless behind the previous RX 470. The GTX 1650 Super and 5500 XT had been between 20-30% quicker than the 470.
World of Tanks isn’t heavy on VRAM utilization so it’s an excellent title for evaluating the older 2GB fashions. Here the GTX 1050 Ti was 29% quicker than the GTX 950, whereas the unique GTX 1650 was simply 11% quicker than the 1050 Ti.
While the RX 470 was 70% quicker than the R9 370X, the 5500 XT was 33% quicker on high of that.
Using the prime quality preset in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is difficult on 2GB graphics playing cards and in consequence the GTX 1050 Ti was 46% quicker than the 370X and 64% quicker than the GTX 950.
The GTX 1650 was simply 27% quicker than the GTX 1050 Ti and matched the a lot older RX 470. Meanwhile, the 5500 XT was 31% quicker than the RX 470.
We determined to re-test Assassin’s Creed Odyssey utilizing the low high quality preset, which is the bottom graphics preset the sport has to supply. This time the 1050 Ti was 29% quicker than the GTX 950. The margin from the 1050 Ti to the 1650 was related, however this time the Turing GPU supplied a 24% efficiency enhance.
The new Radeon 5500 XT was simply 31% quicker than the RX 470, however curiously the GTX 1650 Super does a lot better and is now 52% quicker.
The final sport we examined is 2013’s Tomb Raider reboot utilizing the extremely high quality preset. Here the GTX 1050 Ti was 28% quicker than the late-2015 GPUs, whereas the RX 470 was 84% quicker.
The (vanilla) GTX 1650 once more proved it’s a forgettable product and why we criticized it so closely upon launch. We additionally see that the 5500 XT is 24% quicker than the RX 470, whereas the GTX 1650 Super was a lot better (46% quicker).
We’re not too involved with energy consumption for this comparability, however we all know a few of you’ll respect the information, so right here you could have it.
For these seeking to spend lower than $200 in your subsequent graphics card, or are hoping to improve from a earlier GPU at this value level just like the Radeon RX 470, the most recent choices do not provide a sufficiently big bounce sadly. Of course, this can all rely upon the GPU you already personal, the RX 470 simply occurs to be one of the best of the older graphics playing cards.
Let’s check out an 11 sport common taking a look at all the trendy video games examined.
On common, the Radeon RX 470 was 90% quicker when in comparison with the 2015 competitors, particularly the GTX 950 and RX 370X. That signifies that on the time, in a single yr the ~$170 GPU section acquired an unbelievable 90% efficiency enhance. If we ignore the RX 470 and have a look at the GTX 1050 Ti, we see a extra delicate 33% enhance over the GTX 950, however within the 1050 Ti’s protection it did are available on the lowest MSRP of all these merchandise.
Still we’d say the bounce from the GTX 950 to the 1050 Ti was fairly weak. Then the bounce from the 1050 Ti to the unique 1650 was even weaker. The Turing-based GPU was 25% quicker than its predecessor however shockingly 12% slower than the RX 470.
The GTX 1650 Super helped to level issues in the appropriate route, with a 23% enhance over the RX 470. The similar goes for the extra lately launched Radeon RX 5500 XT. Again, if we ignore the RX 470, the 5500 XT and 1650 Super are 75% quicker than the GTX 1050 Ti, which is a big efficiency acquire in case you’re coming from that GPU.
Below is a have a look at price per body evaluating the discharge MSRP, that means not present market worth.
This graph is actually telling although…
Look on the lighter blue ‘price per body’ bars. The GTX 950 which was the higher worth possibility of late 2015 is available in at a price of $4.10 per body based mostly on updated information. The GTX 1050 Ti supplied a reasonably substantial 34% discount in price per body, whereas the RX 470 was very disruptive at a 41% low cost.
Then years later the GTX 1650 is available in providing only a 5% low cost over the 470, which is irrelevant as a result of by then we already had the Radeon RX 570 which was a a lot better worth.
The Radeon 5500 XT is 23% cheaper than the RX 470 per body and simply 14% cheaper than the RX 570, once more when evaluating the 570 on the MSRP, not the present market value. Point is, when evaluating the launch costs the 5500 XT is at finest providing a 23% low cost over the RX 470, three years later, and the GTX 1650 Super isn’t a lot better.
Even if we ignore the amazingly good worth RX 470 and have a look at the 1050 Ti, the story for contemporary GPUs isn’t nice. The 1050 Ti was 34% cheaper than the 950 per body, whereas the 1650 Super is simply 35% higher than the 1050 Ti per body. The GTX 1050 Ti was launched only a yr after the 950, whereas the GTX 1650 Super was launched three years after the 1050 Ti.
Lastly one thing that all the time comes up is the motive force nerfing argument… so we determined to match the 2013 Tomb Raider outcomes to what we noticed within the trendy titles. Scaling between the previous and newer video games appears pretty constant. The solely standout right here is the GTX 1650 Super which did higher relative to the 5500 XT in Tomb Raider, however that is only a single title, so it’s not stunning to see a consequence like this. In reality, we’re actually shocked how related the scaling is for probably the most half.
The R9 370X and GTX 950, for instance, had been evenly matched within the trendy and older video games. Same goes for the GTX 1050 Ti and 1650, so we will’t see any driver nerfing happening right here.
What We Learned
Stagnation within the sub-$200 GPU section is actual. There’s no 50% efficiency beneficial properties to be seen right here and the RX 470 actually does make a mockery of the GTX 1650 Super and RX 5500 XT. Even by way of energy consumption they’re not overly superior: you’re taking a look at a ~20% enhance in efficiency for a similar stage of energy utilization after Three years.
Ultimately what players actually care about are frames and in case you purchased an RX 470 for $180 three years in the past, you’ll nonetheless be sitting round twiddling your thumbs ready for a worthwhile improve on the similar value level. Short of spending $350 on a Radeon RX 5700, you may as nicely maintain making do with the 470 till one thing else comes alongside.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Super on Amazon
- AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT on Amazon
- GeForce GTX 1660 Super on Amazon
- GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on Amazon
- GeForce RTX 2060 Super on Amazon
- AMD Radeon RX 590 on Amazon
- AMD Radeon RX 580 on Amazon
- AMD Radeon RX 570 on Amazon
- AMD Radeon RX 5700 on Amazon
- GeForce RTX 2070 Super on Amazon
- AMD Ryzen 5 3600 on Amazon