General

Boots in racism row as shopper finds security tags on 'black' hair products but not 'white' ones

Boots has turn into embroiled in a racism row after a buyer complained security tags have been solely current on “black” hair products but not these for “white people”.

Natasha Wright, a make-up artist, posted a video on-line displaying rows of hair necessities labelled “black hair care” sealed by security units, designed to stop theft.

But in the following aisle have been rows of hair necessities for “white” folks, together with Aussie and L’Oreal manufacturers, untagged regardless of some costing £10 every.

Boots stated its employees put security tags on objects they imagine are being stolen “regardless” of what they’re. 

In the video, displaying the retail big’s Wembley High Road department, Ms Wright may be heard seething on the disparity. “Boots, what are you trying to say?,” she asks. “If you assume we’re going to be coming into your retailer stealing, don’t hassle to inventory it.

“Stick to what you recognize finest. But don’t insult us, Boots.”

She wrote on Facebook: “As a person of color it’s a beautiful factor after we can do a magnificence store all in one place, it makes you’re feeling included.”

She continued,:“To be made to really feel like second class residents is an absolute travesty,” including in block capitals: “shame on you Boots”. 

The row comes after Walmart was additionally accused of racism for locking ‘African American’ magnificence products in glass cupboards, whereas leaving these for white folks on open show. 

Customer Jasmine Saunders, 42, claimed the chain was “singling out” black ladies with “racial discrimination coverage and apply” that denied them dignity.

Following the Wembley retailer row, Boots stated: “To forestall theft our colleagues add security tags to the products they imagine are being stolen. 

“They do that no matter what the product is, the price of it, or which aisle they’re on.”

Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

To Top