Tory rebels not backing down in face of PM’s sacking threat

Conservative rebels say they’ve not been fazed by Boris Johnson’s “back me or be sacked” threat and can assist efforts to dam a no-deal Brexit.

Eddisbury MP Antoinette Sandbach informed Sky News she can be voting in opposition to no-deal this week, in defiance of the prime minister’s EU exit plans.

Opposition MPs will start their makes an attempt on Tuesday, when parliament returns from its summer season break, to forestall the UK leaving the EU with out a withdrawal settlement, regardless of Mr Johnson’s promise to ship Brexit on 31 October regardless of the circumstances.

Number 10 has issued a dramatic threat to any Tory MPs contemplating backing these efforts – that they may lose the Conservative whip, successfully expelling them from the get together, and not be chosen as Tory candidates on the subsequent basic election.

A deliberate assembly between Mr Johnson and potential Tory rebels, forward of a possible parliamentary showdown, was additionally cancelled on Monday.

Ms Sandbach dismissed Downing Street’s warning, telling Sky News: “I feel so strongly about this that I’m prepared to put my job on the line for my constituents.”

She added this week is “the very last opportunity” for MPs to dam a no-deal Brexit, as a result of prime minister’s choice to droop parliament for as much as 5 weeks from the center of this month.

More from Boris Johnson

Antoinette Sandbach MP
Image: Antoinette Sandbach informed Sky News the PM was being ‘staggeringly hypocritical’

Asked why the prime minister ought to not sack her for disobeying get together orders, Ms Sandbach highlighted how Mr Johnson himself rebelled in opposition to former prime minister Theresa May’s Brexit technique.

“I find it staggeringly hypocritical that he’s threatening to take the whip away,” she mentioned.

“If that had happened to him when he voted against Theresa May’s deal, he wouldn’t have had the opportunity to stand to be prime minister of this country.”

Ms Sandbach added: “Europe has always been an issue on which the Conservative Party has had a broad range of opinions and I’m someone who voted for a deal and to leave in circumstances he didn’t.”

preview image
‘People want to grasp the affect they’re having on weakening Britain’s place’

Ex-justice secretary David Gauke, who has additionally acknowledged his dedication to disregard Downing Street’s threats and vote in opposition to a no-deal Brexit, claimed Mr Johnson is “goading” Tory MPs to insurgent so he can “purge” them from the get together and pressure a snap basic election.

“I think the strategy, to be honest, is to lose this week and then seek a general election having removed those of us who are not against Brexit, not against leaving the EU, but believe we should do so with a deal,” he informed the BBC.

But Education Secretary Gavin Williamson defended the threats being issued to Tory MPs, telling Sky News: “We all received elected in 2017 on a transparent manifesto dedication to ship Britain’s exit from the EU.

“The prime minister has been abundantly clear we will exit the EU on 31 October.

“And by voting with Jeremy Corbyn and the Labour opposition all you’re doing is weakening the prime minister and Britain’s hand in order to deliver Britain’s exit with a good deal.”

Mr Williamson additionally grew to become the second cupboard minister in 24 hours to refuse to rule out the federal government ignoring any laws handed by MPs to dam a no-deal Brexit.

He mentioned: “Every government, where new legislation is passed, obviously takes a moment and an opportunity to look at that and see how that impacts.”

:: Listen to Sophy Ridge on Sunday on Apple podcasts, Google podcasts, Spotify, Spreaker

Business Secretary Andrea Leadsom appeared to assist that stance by stating the “highest authority in the UK is the people”.

“They voted to leave the EU. Parliament must obey that instruction,” she added.

Mr Gauke mentioned he would take the bizarre step of writing to Attorney General Geoffrey Cox and Lord Chancellor Robert Buckland to ask them to substantiate whether or not the federal government believes in the rule of regulation.

Former Brexit minister Steve Baker, who voted in opposition to Mrs May’s Brexit deal, argued there was a distinction between Brexiteers’ rejection of the present withdrawal settlement and the plot by MPs to dam a no-deal Brexit – which is more likely to see them attempt to seize management of the House of Commons agenda from the federal government.

“Voting against a policy is categorically different from voting to take away the government’s power to govern,” Mr Baker posted on Twitter, in response to Ms Sandbach’s claims of Number 10 hypocrisy.

Former Tory MP Nick Boles, who give up the get together in March, dismissed the federal government’s solutions the Commons would undermine Mr Johnson’s negotiations with the EU by ruling out a no-deal Brexit.

He informed Sky News: “I’ve to say, that’s fairly the stupidest argument that the prime minister makes use of – and there is fairly stiff competitors for that.

“The concept that threatening to shoot your personal foot off is an efficient negotiating ploy is simply ludicrous.”

To Top